After the stillbirth of their son, journalists Jop de Vrieze and Zvezdana Vukojevic are in search of answers within the Dutch system of natal care. Gynecologist: ”Could we have saved him? Maybe, yes.” “Couldn’t you have called sooner?” Fifteen minutes earlier I stepped into our midwife practice, because I couldn’t remember
Lees verder
As science journalists who take our job seriously, we’ve learned a couple of rules by heart: never present a correlation as a causation, always check whether a sample is representative and never rely on a single study. As the expression goes: one swallow doesn’t make a summer. These are all good
Lees verder
Link: Meta-analyses were supposed to end scientific debates. Often, they only cause more controversy
Lees verder
Link: In science, a small revolution is taking place: the rise of registered reports
Lees verder
Link: EurekAlert! Has spoiled science news. Here’s how we can fix it
Lees verderA modern day do-over of a mid-20th century pupillometry experiment raises the question: What should we make of a failed replication? December 6, 2018 by Jop de Vrieze Anyone who enters the field of pupillometry — the study of pupil size — stumbles upon one classic research paper: “Pupil Size as Related
Lees verderLink: ‘Replication grants’ will allow researchers to repeat nine influential studies that still raise questions
Lees verderLink: Chemical controllers: How hormones influence your body and mind
Lees verderLink: Bruno Latour, a veteran of the ‘science wars,’ has a new mission
Lees verder
Link: Serie Worstelende Wetenschap – De Groene Amsterdammer
Lees verder