As science journalists who take our job seriously, we’ve learned a couple of rules by heart: never present a correlation as a causation, always check whether a sample is representative and never rely on a single study. As the expression goes: one swallow doesn’t make a summer. These are all good starting points. But they are far from making us unimpeachable in our reporting. As a result of the third principle, we tend to rely on review studies. More specifically:
Lees verder
Link: Meta-analyses were supposed to end scientific debates. Often, they only cause more controversy
Lees verder
Link: In science, a small revolution is taking place: the rise of registered reports
Lees verder
Link: EurekAlert! Has spoiled science news. Here’s how we can fix it
Lees verderLink: ‘Replication grants’ will allow researchers to repeat nine influential studies that still raise questions
Lees verderLink: Bruno Latour, a veteran of the ‘science wars,’ has a new mission
Lees verder
Link: Serie Worstelende Wetenschap – De Groene Amsterdammer
Lees verder