As science journalists who take our job seriously, we’ve learned a couple of rules by heart: never present a correlation as a causation, always check whether a sample is representative and never rely on a single study. As the expression goes: one swallow doesn’t make a summer. These are all good starting points. But they are far from making us unimpeachable in our reporting. As a result of the third principle, we tend to rely on review studies. More specifically:
Lees verderlink
Link: Meta-analyses were supposed to end scientific debates. Often, they only cause more controversy
Lees verderLink: In science, a small revolution is taking place: the rise of registered reports
Lees verderLink: EurekAlert! Has spoiled science news. Here’s how we can fix it
Lees verderLink: ‘Replication grants’ will allow researchers to repeat nine influential studies that still raise questions
Lees verderLink: Chemical controllers: How hormones influence your body and mind
Lees verderLink: Bruno Latour, a veteran of the ‘science wars,’ has a new mission
Lees verderLink: Serie Worstelende Wetenschap – De Groene Amsterdammer
Lees verderLink: Award Winners | Science Journalism Awards We have gold! Our article about our son Mikki’s stillbirth and how the Dutch birthcare system contributed to his death was awarded the most prestigious international prize for science journalism.
Lees verder